indexer: notabug.io
all comments

[] -3 points

Lets start with your premise that a late term abortion kills a 'kid'. The fetus, and even a new born baby, doesn't really have the software programming to be a human yet. There's potential but it is not yet a person.

But lets ignore that and accept your premise that it is a person just for kicks. Then we can address your second "point" that it is not about woman's rights. How can it not be? It is her body and her decision who she hosts in it. She has a right to decide what goes in, or out, of her body. If she doesn't want to host some parasite that leaches off her body then it is certainly her right to remove it. It's her body.

[] -0 points

Just because the baby can't live on its own doesn't mean you can kill it, otherwise anyone could be "aborted" up until they're 18.

[] -0 points

with that mentality killing puppies is ok!

[] -1 points

I'm actually okay with that. Animals are property and what you do with your own property is your problem.

[] -0 points

you mentioned she has control over what goes in and out of her body, which is exactly my point. She can, instead of killing others to escape the consequences of her actions, just choose to not get pregnant.

[] -1 points

Your mum could have chosen to drop you on your head.

[] -1 points

if she has control over her body she could choose to not get pregnant. Taking a life because a woman didn't have the forethought to avoid pregnancy in the first place isn't an excuse. Yes a woman has the choice to not be pregnant, its called choosing to use birth control, or just closing their legs

[] -1 points

You are a monster.

[] -1 points

Bullshit.

[] -0 points

Got an explanation as to why my viewpoint is bullshit?

π