indexer: notabug.io
all comments

[] -0 points

CCP is the trick Voat use to restrict users speech. Think about a recaptcha that instead having you to click on cars picture ask you to post a certain number of pro conservative/alt-right content because that's the only way you are going to get upvoted there.

[] -0 points

What, isn't v/justgrowit still around? I just posted there about gardening.

[] -0 points

It's free for the admins to decide whatever your community is good or bad. If people start to discuss about gardening and reach 100 CCP they may decide that they are not being genuine and only trying to farm CCP. It happened many times already I've personally seen 4 or 5 communities being shut down for that reason. I also witnessed right winged communities openly farming CCP not being banned.

[] -0 points

Was the right wing community SBBH or similar?

[] -0 points

The head mod @Middle_Path is a MtoF homo

[] -0 points

They use the same thing in /r/btc with downvotes triggering a 10minute comment timer on people.

[] -0 points

I think mods can't do that, that's reddit-wide "feature" (timer when subreddit-specific karma is negative)

[] -0 points

Yeah that's their plausible deniability. Meanwhile it's brigaded and used as a censor.

[] -0 points

Make valid communistic points and I'm sure you'll get upvoated too

[] -0 points

@Crensch is a faggot & a kike

[] -0 points

A community formed on the premise of driving out everyone who doesn't think like them, then demands features which completely exclude any username they brigade against? Shock horror!

[] -0 points

Follow the money

[]Selene -0 points

allowing spam isn't being less restrictive. Spam itself is form of restriction.

[] -0 points

good for them

[] -0 points

Yea we shouldn't care about what happens in that shady place but its sad to see so many people being fooled. You can tell that there are some genuine users in there who believe in free speech and erroneously think that Voat will grant it for them.

[] -0 points

You can never rely on freedom-by-policy in the long run. You've got to decentralise so that, by design, no one is in a position to take away your freedom of speech.

[]Tree_Perception -0 points

This is why I never trusted Gab over Mastodon. Despite the head Mastodon devs being cucks, they made a truly censorship free network in which their own policies only affect their own instance.

[] -0 points

Mastodon is actually heavily censored and entire instances are silenced. It's not censorship free it's only decentralized.

[] -0 points

You say that like decentralization and censorship are unrelated.

Decentralization limits the power of any censor.

[] -0 points

It only limits the chances of centralization. In practice it may limits censorship because we are used to big centralizated networks that have mandatory content censorship that extend to every user.

[]Tree_Perception -0 points

I'm well aware of what the devs do on their own instance and it's why I mentioned the network as a whole.

[] -0 points

in the comments they mention restricting upvoting and posting submissions entirely to 100 ccp, same as downvoting

[] -0 points

This is telling of admins manipulative intentions. They are being funded by some alt-right group and with a 100 ccp restriction they could basically hold this biased userbase for years.

[]poopdawg15 -0 points

Nobody in the comments section of that thread mentioning Mossadi manipulate of quality posters.

[] -1 points

ITT: people crying because they understand nothing about websites, internet trolling, and forum sliding. lulz Stay thirsty.

[] -2 points

fuck off jew.

[]Tree_Perception -0 points

Friendly fire?

π