[–] 11 hours ago in whatever
temporary anon-ids is the solution actually
[–]Batman 11 hours ago in whatever
Batman is the solution
what would you do, Batman?
that's the solution in physical space, but not when you are dealing with text strings
what does Batman take in his whisky?
What do you guys think of waking up at the same time everyday
it's great when you must wake up or you'll miss a plane
or you must wake up or you'll get a 10% of wage fine
in other cases it's not so great
It's good for your health, but sooner or later something is gonna happen in reality that will disrupt your ccycle
e.g. most people don't keep the same routine on the weekend as during the week
[–] 10 hours ago in whatever
I did this non-24h thing for awhile, an hour extra every night. Touched dawn would force me into bed. Then didn't give a shit about dawn and was doing 28h days. Then started doing 2 days up 1 day down. 12 sleep, 12 hours doing not much, back into activity. Drives you into the ground eventually.
Oh it's Batman, we met you one night in Sydney. You wanted to party and tried to get in our van.
[–] 9 hours ago in whatever
It is very oportant to walskd
[–]go1dfish 8 hours ago in whatever
You’re welcome to invite folks but spamming won’t do much good
[–] 7 hours ago in whatever
[–] 5 hours ago in whatever
[–] 1 hour ago in whatever
[–]go1dfish 1 hour ago in whatever
[–] 59 minutes ago in whatever
[–] 49 minutes ago in whatever
goldfish are you somewhat important
[–] 48 minutes ago in whatever
No, he's not
[–] 47 minutes ago in whatever
"That's Just How These People Are" (self.politics)
+0 -0 submitted 1 week ago to t/politics
Better support for participating without it may come in the future.
[–]+0 -0 points 1 week ago
But, thats just how niggers are. They've always been a violent bunch, they can't help it. This is a statement of fact not Ism-ing like this article suggests
said like a true snownigger
[–]+0 -1 points 1 week ago
"Racism assumes that everyone belongs to some alleged group, i.e. that people are “white” or “Caucasian”, “Arabic”, “Native American”, “Gipsy” etc. This enumeration is not a real description of actual groups, as there are no races; race is a nonsense category. Neither biologically nor culturally can humanity be sorted into such groups."
False. We can easily group people and where admixture has taken place, the grouping is defined in the same way that the grouping of blue and red to make purple is done, by listing the base groups. This doesn't even need any complex data analysis: when sampled, people self-report within the groups predicted correctly 99% of the time, regardless of culture.
But when we do use analysis of the data, the picture becomes even more clear: races exist. From medicine to psychology to sociology, different races manifest different measurements. They are a very real category and denying them is anti-scientific.
You are grasping at straw.
Scientific definitions and categorizations are constantly evolving and their measurements are often arbitrary. The term "race" itself varies greatly in signification depending on what field of science one is dealing with. Your source establishes nothing more than a spectrum of genetic variation at one arbitrary marker point and fuzzy clusters within that spectrum. This data does not at all substantiate the concept of race as a political category.
finally your source concedes:
"So first off, there is no obvious consensus on the existence of race, so we cannot use consensus as a heuristic one way or another."
(last section "conclusions")
open-source code | notabug 0.64.0 | known peers
By using this peer, you agree to its