indexer: notabug.io
all comments

[] -2 points

Primary source: https://justice.org.uk/new-justice-working-party-report-prosecuting-sexual-offences/

Thanks for archiving, but the Daily Mail is still the Daily Mail.

[]go1dfish -0 points

Personally I dislike the practice of submitting archived links because it makes source less clear at a glance.

When we do user settings, I'd like to provide an option to automatically use archivers to handle links for certain domains at the end user side.

I think dropping archive links in comments is great too. But of course this is just my opinion; do what you want.

Edit: it should also be noted that in addition to making source harder to see at a glance, it makes it harder to use in space configs.

[] -0 points

You're not gonna see archives as legit submissions for much longer after someone spams bait&switch links of archived shock content.

[]go1dfish -0 points

That's kind of what I meant by making it harder to use in space configs.

If your space wants to exhaustively exclude example.com you also have to exclude archive domains and link shorteners.

Might make sense to have some shorthand for "content aliases" for archivers and link shortener services but not sure what that would look like.

[] -0 points

The only reason you haven't seen archive trolling yet is because anyone who managed to make it in here this early understands the importance of archives in general.

[]x0x7 -1 points

Fake link. And he did it twice because the last one got downvoted for being fake.

[] -0 points

fake how?

[]offendedsexregister -11 points

This is amazing!!

Especially because the alternative is the same thing as creating a copyright policy for child pornography and only increases the amount of child porn produced.

Do this! They didn't harm any one. If you are worried about future harm (all stats say these aren't the same people as those who actually abuse kids) then do a harm reduction program. Jail is pointless, violent, intentionally cruel and unusual considering you know what's going to happen, and unnecessary because it's for someone who did ZERO HARM.

[] -4 points

kill yourself

[] -0 points

Why, because I'm smart enough to understand the economics of keeping your kids safe and you aren't.

Your kids would be less safe without me because they would be stuck living in a world run by morons like you who are dumb enough to think you are protecting them while proving a copyright to a market that abuses them.

New idea. People who can't do high level math should kill themselves. It will be the great eugenic leap forward. Then we won't have these problems because this is actually a pretty simple statistics/economics problem. About the easiest anyone with a stem backgroud could approach, but all the non-stems don't know how to begin to approach even the most simple problems so all they have is emotion.

Imagine building a bridge based on emotion. Imagine trying to protect your kids from child pornography with emotion. As much as you want to make this a purely emotional issue, it's just not going to work. You will institute cobra effects because you don't know how to calculate if you have or have not done that. The world will burn from you attempting to put out fires with any liquid you can get your hands on.

[]offendedsexregister -0 points

All I'm saying is judges have a higher causal relationship with child pornography considering they are the ones implementing a copy right policy for it. So why not send them to jail? It literally makes more sense.

[] -3 points

Primary source: https://justice.org.uk/new-justice-working-party-report-prosecuting-sexual-offences/

Thanks for archiving, but the Daily Mail is still the Daily Mail.

[] -0 points

Dupe

[]Selene -1 points

Child porn isn't about punishing wrong think, it's about not creating a market for material that can only be created by abusing kids. This does nothing to prevent the latter, and just goes to show how sick our country has become.

It's the same people who want to push wrongthink as being a crime who are probably the ones creating this stuff, and consuming it, and abusing kids.

[] -0 points

Media markets don't function without applying risk to a non-paying party.

Why do you think the production has increased while it's been punished.

If you want to not create a market that abuses kids then don't create a market. Media markets are not natural free market phenomenon. They require government intervention to exist. Ironically criminalization is that equivalent intervention.

[] -0 points

material that can only be created by abusing kids.

This could be solved with CGI

[] -1 points

material that can only be created by abusing kids

maybe some created by kids? most of them look sad, or frightened. but some do look like they're having fun

π