[–]TheUniverseIsEmpty 8 hours ago in whatever
Everytime there is a subreddit quarantine I laugh.
The reasons are so absurd.
[–]go1dfish 8 hours ago in whatever
Yeah they are literally language policing now
They won't ban or quarantine bpt for being racists, but they'll quarantine waterniggas for including the n-word.
[–] 8 hours ago in whatever
some subreddits have automods that autodelete comments with certain words
Whoever banned waterniggas is one dehydrated motherfucker
Look at offmychest. You get banned for POSTING in a certain sub.
Quarantine is not a ban. It's a "let's consider a ban," warning.
I've seen "paticipation in hate subs is grounds for a ban"
Banning is meaningless anyway, as its trivial to create another account
It's actually against Reddit's policies, but the admins threw that out of the window anyway.
Punishing people in one sub for what they did in another ?
Yeah. It's against Reddit's official policies to ban users for posting in a sub.
The admins don't give a fuck so it means nothing.
AgainstHateSubreddits is a hate subreddit, but it has the same agenda as the admins so it's also unbannable.
I'm never surprised when centralised pwer is abused
You gotta decentralise in the first place
Hey, goldfish, if you're still here, whatever happened to your Reddit account. I heard you talk about it a while ago. But I don't think anyone asked why the admins killed it.
Admins of a site acting badly is about as surprising as a dictator acting badly.
Did the admins just nuke it from orbit? They've done that before.
Usually they suspend now.
[–]Tree_Perception 6 hours ago in whatever
They refuse to log him in, if you try to log in as go1dfish the error message is different from the rest, or so it was about half a year when another nabber looked at his account
On injecting global policy into people's listing source: it may already work that way, but please display it as two separate listing sources, I don't want user actions to be mixed up with admin ones
what was gamergate and why did 4chan ban it? (self.ask)
+0 -0 submitted 5 months ago* by NABto t/ask
holy shit I can edit?
so much for immuitable.
Better support for participating without it may come in the future.
[–]+2 -0 points 5 months ago
It all started with a little video game design competition. Then some dude shacked up with one of the judges... and won. The competition was accused to bias. They responded by saying they were only accused of bias because of their gender. Once gender was brought in suddenly everything became about gender and oh no, they were being oppressed by the evil gamers. Then idiot gamers engaged them within their own framing and a long stupid argument happened which grew to be about gender issues in gaming as a whole (as if that was a thing outside of their imaginations).
All the arguing was useful for those authoritarians that like to control discourse. Once the eye of sauron turned to the issue it became too hot to host. Over time this evolved into re-writing of history and "the end of gamers". Hah.
[–]+1 -0 points 5 months ago
I think it was the best thing to happen. Corruption works best when unnoticed and unchallenged. All this corruption is now causally linked in people's minds to the poison of feminism, post modernism, cultural marxism, and so on.
If it hadn't been challenged, we wouldn't be able to draw that clear link of corruption. People would blame companies in isolation and not see the bigger picture. Cowards could have hidden behind the explanation of stupidity or greed for the failures of EA, or Bioware, etc.
Now we see their true motivations each time another propaganda ridden game is released. Get woke; go broke is a mainstream understanding of the phenomenon and it is in part thanks to the public confrontation of this problem that drew out so many SJWs into the light. Once gamers were attacked and defamed, once the media lied about us, there was no way we would ever trust them after that. Once someone lies about you, there is no room for deception. You KNOW they are corrupt liars.
Gamergate was tedious but it was the best outcome possible. I wish it would happen in other industries.
[–]go1dfish+1 -0 points 5 months ago*
Immutable was listed more as a warning than a feature.
You can still prove a lack of edits, and the idea of immutable content is still supported and could be enforced by peers that want it.
Edit: Also, only you can edit your content everything is still cryptographically signed by your identity.
[–]NAB+1 -0 points 5 months ago
have to say this is the first time I have seen “its a warning not a feature”
[–]go1dfish+1 -0 points 5 months ago
I just don't see immutability as all that desirable for this sort of site; but it's still possible to achieve.
You can prevent edits in an editable system easier than you can make edits work in an immutable system.
I do agree having edits are better than not having them.
[–]RustyFoster+0 -0 points 5 months ago
Stupid bitch DJWs went apeshit over gender quality in games.
Super Mario Brothers they save the helpless Princess Peach so it was misogynist.
Also Female characters in shoot them up games show off too much skin.
Should have gender other than male and female in games as well.
[–]+0 -0 points 5 months ago
Banned because it grew into pizzagate. SJWs started bitching about video games not being SJW enough
open-source code | notabug 0.57.2 | known peers
By using this peer, you agree to its