[–]TheUniverseIsEmpty 9 hours ago in whatever
Everytime there is a subreddit quarantine I laugh.
The reasons are so absurd.
[–]go1dfish 9 hours ago in whatever
Yeah they are literally language policing now
They won't ban or quarantine bpt for being racists, but they'll quarantine waterniggas for including the n-word.
[–] 9 hours ago in whatever
some subreddits have automods that autodelete comments with certain words
Whoever banned waterniggas is one dehydrated motherfucker
Look at offmychest. You get banned for POSTING in a certain sub.
Quarantine is not a ban. It's a "let's consider a ban," warning.
I've seen "paticipation in hate subs is grounds for a ban"
Banning is meaningless anyway, as its trivial to create another account
It's actually against Reddit's policies, but the admins threw that out of the window anyway.
Punishing people in one sub for what they did in another ?
Yeah. It's against Reddit's official policies to ban users for posting in a sub.
The admins don't give a fuck so it means nothing.
AgainstHateSubreddits is a hate subreddit, but it has the same agenda as the admins so it's also unbannable.
I'm never surprised when centralised pwer is abused
You gotta decentralise in the first place
Hey, goldfish, if you're still here, whatever happened to your Reddit account. I heard you talk about it a while ago. But I don't think anyone asked why the admins killed it.
Admins of a site acting badly is about as surprising as a dictator acting badly.
Did the admins just nuke it from orbit? They've done that before.
Usually they suspend now.
[–]Tree_Perception 7 hours ago in whatever
They refuse to log him in, if you try to log in as go1dfish the error message is different from the rest, or so it was about half a year when another nabber looked at his account
On injecting global policy into people's listing source: it may already work that way, but please display it as two separate listing sources, I don't want user actions to be mixed up with admin ones
+0 -0 submitted 4 months ago to t/ask
Would they work in nab, or is the decentralization and anonymous functionality too contrary to that?
Better support for participating without it may come in the future.
[–]go1dfish+2 -0 points 4 months ago
Probably not well until we have private messaging,
[–]NAB+1 -0 points 4 months ago
we must not be too hastey about private messaging though. We need to make sure it is completly secure from all angles, and idependetly evaluated before we treat it as private in any mannor
[+]+0 -4 points 4 months ago
There are no women here dumbass.
[–]+0 -0 points 4 months ago
NAB was my first thought when I saw backpage had gone down.
For sure need end-to-end encrypted messaging.
[–]RustyFoster+0 -0 points 4 months ago
Nope, that's not a good idea. Craigslist Killer could move to Notabug.
Rusty "This statement is a lie" Foster killed the free internet when he banned NIWS.
Rusty has too much power! save notabug from his ego! blablabla
you would probably have to dox yourself at some point
open-source code | notabug 0.57.2 | known peers
By using this peer, you agree to its